|
About Retail GeeksRetail Geeks is an online platform providing institutional investors unbiased retail/consumer industry commentary and data. |
Weekly SnapshotEach week we provide an example of our historical financial metrics and stock price movements. 08.27.2010 Snapshot |
Micro-Cap FocusEach month we provide visitors an example of one of our research notes on Micro-Cap retailers. May 2010: CWTR |
Data Packet of the MonthEach month we provide visitors an example of one of our updated data packets. 07.01.2010 FDO Data Packet |
Comp Run Rates, 5-YearEach month we update our compilation of comp store sales "stacks" for 120+ companies. 06.03.2010 Run Rates |
Retail Geeks is proudly powered by
WordPress
Entries (RSS)
and Comments (RSS).

Will Lowered Sourcing Costs Boost Bottom-Line in 2H 2009?
Thursday, May 21st, 2009When listening to conference calls this retail earnings season, analysts are asking each management team to quantify go forward sourcing savings. It’s clear that analysts and management teams believe these savings to be largely incremental to the bottom-line.
Yesterday, Target (TGT- 41.60) management made the following statement (see transcript below) that reflects their belief that they’ll need to lower pricing to remain competitive. Maybe they’re being conservative, but clearly their comments do not suggest a bottom-line benefit from the lowered sourcing costs.
That brings up the following questions… why do management teams (and analysts) believe that they’ll be able to maintain the current pricing structure and ‘pocket’ the savings? Why will retail, overall, not face AUR pressure in 2H 2009 if the sector lowers its pricing to reflect the newly lowered sourcing cost structure? Why will this not lead to the price deflation we’re seeing today at the grocers? Why would specialty retail be any different?
TGT Conference Call May 20, 2009:
Charles Grom - J.P. Morgan – Analyst
Kathy Tesija - Target Corporation – EVP Merchandising
Gregg Steinhafel - Target Corporation – Chairman, President and CEO
Posted in Commentary | No Comments »